Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Bebo, multiple Ningworks (typically 38 Minutes), Digg, Reddit, Yammer, Google Apps (I include Mail, Docs and Wave), LinkedIn, Plaxo…. and there are more. I have also very recently started blogging and even though I knew it would be difficult to find the time, it really is difficult to find the time…
I’m now increasing my social fatigue by reviewing aggregator tools (+ mobile apps) to help me manage the various profiles I’ve set up. As Twitter and Facebook profiles become integrated in more and more apps/sites through Open ID mechanics, I find myself experiencing a degree of difficulty managing my personal PR. What exactly am I saying … to who … and where?
It has become a bit like sitting in a hall of mirrors, watching myself from all angles, though not necessarily gaining any perspective. I wonder if it’s a bad thing that we’re slowly … perhaps not so slowly … drifting into an age where we cannot experience anything without documenting it. I used to grind my teeth at people in gigs who would spend most of the time viewing the concert through the screen of their mobile phone. What’s the point? I would think…. you’re missing the live experience. I feel the same about people who continually micro-blog on holiday; can’t you just leave us [your audience] alone for a bit?
Micro-blogging might not be a bad thing … I’d like to think I still have an open mind on this, but it may raise the question: how can you be entirely in a space with a loved one(s), if you’re also pondering about talking about it [however briefly] online?
Don’t think that I’m setting a better example…. I went to a gig last night and then stayed up late drinking tea and chatting to a friend [soooo rock and roll]. Yet, even though it was late when I went to bed, I still had to log into Facebook and tell my audience about my day. I’ve become addicted to documenting all my highs and lows in online social spaces.
And then there’s the subject of photos…. I have some female friends who seem to be deliberately manipulating photos … they are planned, rehearsed and Photoshopped. And who can blame them….? Take a look at this piece on OKCupid.com… I’ve yet to see male friends organising photo shoots to get their best side, but I have seen many pictures that have clearly been taken from a bedroom, at arm’s length, possibly involving at least a couple of takes to get an aesthetically pleasing, but in effect, dull photo.
There was an interesting article on the Harvard Business School Working Knowledge Blog on “Understanding Users of Social Networks”. The article makes a few points… not all nice … not all that new either…?
“The biggest [social networking] usage categories are men looking at women they don’t know, followed by men looking at women they do know. Women look at other women they know. Overall, women receive two-thirds of all page views.
… A lot of guys in relationships are looking at women they don’t know. … It’s an easy way to see if anyone might be a better match.” Again, online networks act as cover.”
Social networking, particularly Facebook, can be a bit like watching late night crap T.V.; you don’t quite know why you’re there, but somehow can’t tear yourself away to do something more constructive. I admit that I’m a Facebook girl, in the same way that certain Blondes associate themselves with Twitter. There remain some MySpace and even… ahem… Bebo users in the office, but we try not to mention them too often.
Evolution in social networking could be to focus on the profile, rather than the space (appreciate some of us are heading in that direction anyway) and lets throw in some AI (artificial intelligence) in there…. Why should our human minds have to do all the work? A possible solution, which has already been explored in parts, may accommodate technologies like this one:
“socially aware memory for companion agents”
So… creating avatars, based on various profiles/personas and to allow these representatives/programs/”familiars” to explore the Web. We would be able to pull and push information in a more dynamic, three-dimensional form; accommodating a degree of Search, C.V, business card exchange, RSS, calendar information, interests and perhaps even absorb other forms of ID. Hmm, that’s a lot of waffle…. How about a kind of digital daemon (Pullman fans?) structured with Open ID access (independently owned)…. In fact I wonder if we could create digital daemons… whether these would become software products that people pay money to rent or own… Whilst ownership of this information remains controversial, I might be willing to review who I trust with this data if it cut me some slack in managing my profiles…

